Abstract

Abstract

In this study we have dealt with eight issues in " tamyeez " distinction :
First : The Basrah Group and al-Kisa'I made it a pre-condition that distinction should be non defined , contrary to the Kufi's who believed in the posibility of its being defiend . We have corrected the belief of the group but not completely , for we have said that the one which is defined by additon to a pronoun is possible to be regarded as being defined .
Second : We object to the belief of the grammarias that distinction is surplus because if cannot be neglected in the speech .
Third : A- We object to the speech of the grammarians that distinction includes the meaning of ( from ) ( min ) because some distinction dose not have the meaning of from ( min ) .
B- We correct the speech of those who say that the distinction that comes after the verbs of prise or condemnation dose not include the meaning of from .
Fourth : The disagreement of the grammarians on the meaning of from ( min ) that appears with distinction . some of them believe that it means some whereas others see it as surplus . We believe that there is no difference between the two types and they have one meanig , that is , showing the gender .
Fifth : Types or Partes of Distintion .
Sixth : The change of the meaning of distinction according to the change in its pictures and numbers .
Seventh : The change of the meaning of distinction in singularity, duplicity and plurality .
Eighth : The aim of chage to distinction .