Abstract

This study has tackled the lofty work of the sheik " Muhammad Abdulkhaliq Udhyma " who had prepared us a new base when looking at the supernaturality of the Glorious Qura:n. The sheik Udhyma had recorded a lot of information of what had escaped the old grammarians and had rectified them from the time of " Sebawaih " till " Ibn – Husham " . This does not mean that he he was hunting and replying their errors and even to reducing tieir work , but it means that the base that they had constructed at their times was in need to this strict attention to all what the Glorious Qura:n contains of letters , meanings , grammatical and rhetoric styles . This attention was out of their abilities at that time . The sheik Udhyma thinks that the pioneers were busy with the poetry instead of investigating the instances of the Glorious Qura:n . There fore , their judgments came imperfect concerning the Glorious Qura:n and its marvelous style .
And as I think that , what the sheik had dealt with is the accounting of these things in the Glorious Qura:n and to put them in their proper positions of grammar , morphology and stylistics .
The grammarians themselves were believing that poetry was beneath the Glorious Qura:n in quotation and in constructing the grammatical rule , Al- Far'aa stated that : ( and the book Qura:n is eloquent and strongest in evidence than poetry ) . In spite of that , the sheik mentions that there have been many rules for those grammarians which they did not return to the style of the Glorious Qura:n in their judgments , so that they prevented many styles which their counter part came in the Glorious Qura:n
I pursued in this paper the replys of the sheik Udhyma on the grammarians and tried earnestly to study the fact of these replys and to discuss their components .
I have found that the Sheik Udhyma was right at many czses in his reply to the grammarian . Since agreat number of them had left the Qura:nic subject in a great deal . This had led grammarians to ignore many of the hi Qura:nic styles , these so – called styles no longer used till this day . But at the same , he was not minute in giving his judgments on the grammarians . Because I found many of these replys are vague and lack to accuracy in giving general judgments on the grammarians .
Sometimes reach to wounding and reducing their status . I was just with the grammarians in my paper and in many cases which the Sheik had pursued on the grammarians and he was not right in them . And at the same time I agreed with the Sheik at many of his replys against the grammarians when I find him right at that .