Abstract

ABSTRACT

The critic discourse suffers from a lack in the understanding of the term and forms that it includes. This lack reflects an aspect of many dilemmas that characterize most of critic exercises in the Arabic cultural scene. It also reflects a side of the features of polarity between a particular critic work and another since into actuation is one of these terms it is also a misty term confused with other terms similar to it such as explaining analyzing etc . Which cause obstacles in the face of the researcher of interrelation theoretically and practically?

This research deals with there problems through a logical basis adopted by the researcher. It begins with a prelude that tackles the rise of the art of interpretation and it relation with religious and how literary century other sciences like physics.
Chen is trying sociology and psychology.
Then the philosophical bases of interpretation are tackled beginning with the attempts of ( Bross) and the theories of ( Amberto Ekko) and ( Kadamir) .

Later the problematic side of the form is accounted for through the hermeneutics and interpretation. Finally the study and Edith and attempt to limit the term through displaying some of the definitions suggested for in perpetration.